Other Upcoming Events

NAPA Benefit Dinner

24 Sep 2019

Malmaison, Birmingham

Young Dementia Annual Conference 2019

20 Nov 2019

St Giles Hotel, London

UK Dementia Congress 2019

05 Nov 2019

Doncaster Racecourse

Beyond Dementia Care - All Care Matters Conference

19 Jul 2019

University of Surrey, Guildford

Caring Times Christmas Lunch 2019

12 Dec 2019

The Dorchester Hotel, Park Lane, London

Dying – whose responsibility?

By guest blogger JEF SMITH

The flow of financial goodies with which the Johnson government hopes to seduce the electorate continued last week with the promise of £25m to improve services for people with terminal illnesses. The greater part of that sum will go to hospices, which provide residential, and increasingly also domiciliary services, for people close to death.

The devotion of the staff and volunteers who work in the hospice movement and the quality of the support they provide cannot be questioned, but why does our society leave the funding for such a vital service to voluntarily-run organisations rather than seeing it as a central element of the NHS’s budget? Most hospices receive less than 30% of their income from government, and nearly three quarters report that since 2017, grants from their local Clinical Commissioning Group have been frozen or even cut. It has even been argued that the existence of this parallel non-governmental structure discourages the NHS from facing up to its own responsibility for providing a better service for the much larger number of people who die in hospitals.

There are other disadvantages to the hospice movement’s existing outside mainstream health services. Hospices still focus very heavily on cancer patients, largely ignoring people dying of other conditions, including the even more prevalent dementia. Their eligibility criteria remain hazy, and their image is heavily contaminated by association with religion – even recent foundations are often named after Christian saints – surely alienating people of other faiths or none and arousing suspicions that they favour some sections of the population. Their geographical coverage of the country is seriously uneven.

Death comes to all of us in due course, so there is no better candidate for mainstream public funding than providing decent facilities for dying with dignity. Mr Johnson’s paltry £25 million evades this much more fundamental issue.

  • The CT Blog is written in a personal capacity – comments and opinions expressed are not necessarily endorsed or supported by Caring Times.

One Reply to “Dying – whose responsibility?”

  1. Jef, I think you may have allowed you own prejudice to intrude by suggesting that people close to death will be alienated by the religious associations of the institutions that are providing their care. As a person of no faith myself, I can categorically declare that I wouldn’t give a fig.

Leave a Reply

Cart Item Removed. Undo
  • No products in the cart.