Other Upcoming Events

Caring Times Christmas Lunch 2021

09 Dec 2021

The Dorchester Hotel, Park Lane, London

The board, the boring and the rude awakening

By guest blogger JOHN?BURTON

Care Quality Commission monthly board meetings are a bore – like watching paint dry. The very fact that they are boring should worry us – the services they inspect aren’t boring, but the meetings are all about CQC. The board spends most of the meeting in complacent self-congratulation.

At May’s meeting, Louis Appleby, the only non-executive board member who can be relied on to challenge the performance and direction of this moribund, worse-than-useless bureaucracy, did question the skilfully massaged figures and the meaning of a ‘Good’ rating. Nevertheless, the meeting soon settled back into its self-satisfied, white torpor. (CQC are very hot on equalities . . . for other organisations.) Still hurt by his own personal experience of the Scottish regulator, Appleby is due to leave CQC next month.

If there is time at the end of the meeting, members of the public are permitted to ask questions or make statements. This slot is frequently taken by sycophants; stooges who testify to their collaboration in the great works of the Commission. As the meeting was sliding into self-satisfied slumber, it was rudely awoken by three people who were far from happy with the organisation.

A black woman told of her family’s efforts to protect her brother who was detained in a private secure hospital, and of how a CQC inspector told her to stop “wasting her time” because she didn’t deal with individuals. She encountered the same brutal callousness at every level, only to find that even at the CQC board meeting she was blocked. She was followed by an elderly white woman who, through her direct experience of domiciliary care for her husband, cut through all the self-justifying blather of the meeting to give a concise critique of the regulator’s methods and ratings – they’re “on the wrong path” but they don’t listen. And finally, a regular critical attender, David Hogarth, questioned whether CQC would ever find a method of reliably rating a home as ‘Good’.

As if nothing had happened, the CQC chief executive ended the meeting by exhorting the public, friends and relatives to “talk to us and tell us what’s going wrong.” A thick brick wall comes to mind.

  • The CT Blog is written in a personal capacity – comments and opinions expressed are not necessarily endorsed or supported by Caring Times.

2 Replies to “The board, the boring and the rude awakening”

  1. I’m interested that three days after the publication of this blog, no one has replied. This is how CQC came into being and how it continues. Keep your head down and hope they don’t get you? This is how Whorlton Hall got a “good” rating, how people continue to be abused, and complicity survives.

  2. Yes the CQC appears to be a law unto themselves ny son suffered 20 years neglect and he family have made 8 complaints in 20 years, all ignored its a system of abuse, corruption, worst the MH trust HPFT
    last year received top credit of Outstanding, utterly, devastating, PALS defends Trust. Son is on pathway to being another fataility in herts, I am aware of many Avoidable deaths through MH and substance use.
    One can see CQC is tick box event with no appropriate investigations…system needs radical change.
    Made me so psychological ill trying to save my sons life, and this is unbelievably 2020

Leave a Reply

Cart Item Removed. Undo
  • No products in the cart.